Commentary:
Is this a victory for the power of the people? Following a long running battle between campaigners and Sheffield City Council over tree felling in the city, (including a judicial review and costs of over £400K for the Council!) the Government has announced plans which would require councils to consult residents, before cutting down trees in urban areas. The below article may also remind those of you that have read ‘The Politics of Consultation’ of the Bedfordshire ‘willow tree’ case, which demonstrated the issues that can arise when people feel they have been denied an opportunity to influence what happens…Take note councils!
Article:
Householders are to be given more say over whether the trees on their streets can be cut down, the government has announced.
Environment secretary Michael Gove has drawn up the plans in the wake of a three-year battle in Sheffield over mass felling of trees.
Campaigners celebrated the announcement but warned the consultations must be genuine and thorough.
Protests have been staged in Sheffield since 2015, when a scheme emerged to fell up to 17,500 street trees that were said to be diseased or a danger to walkers due to roots damaging roads and pavements.
Demonstrators chained themselves to trees in an effort to prevent the work being carried out. The local authority went to the High Court to get an injunction to prevent them climbing inside safety barriers.
Since then, 5,500 trees have been felled, around half of which were on residential streets and were “healthy”. The city prides itself on its environmental standards, calling itself “Europe’s greenest city”.
The city council signed a £2.2bn private finance deal with contractor Amey in 2012 to manage the city’s street trees.
Amey and the council say every tree removed is being replaced with a sapling.
The latest proposals include:
- Making sure communities have their say on whether street trees should be felled with requirements for councils to consult local residents;
- Mandatory reports by councils on tree felling and replanting;
- Giving the Forestry Commission more powers to tackle illegal tree felling and strengthen protection of wooded landscapes.
Chris Rust, co-chair of the Sheffield Tree Action Group, welcomed the news but said it was a shame it had come too late to save thousands of trees in the city.
“We believe the campaign in Sheffield played a big part in getting the government to pay attention to this issue,” he said.
“It’s great that the scheme calls for consultation of residents but we are concerned because councils sometimes treat consultations as a very cursory activity and do it to get the answers they want, so we hope there will be a serious approach to consultation.”
Lord Scriven, a former Sheffield council leader who has been a vocal critic of the city’s mass felling plan, welcomed the announcement, saying: “As the case of the council ignoring local people’s wishes when felling thousands of healthy trees shows, existing laws are not strong enough.”
He said the “devil will be in the detail”, and the “key issue is what statutory powers will be enacted to ensure councils have to take note of what the communities say”.
He added: “Michael Gove and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs would have to be planted on Mars if they hadn’t seen the destruction the council is carrying out to street trees in Sheffield – so I’m absolutely certain that the axe-wielding approach taken by Sheffield will have influenced the approach being suggested.”
Launching a consultation on the measures, Mr Gove said: “It’s right that the views of local people are at the heart of any decision that affects their community – and the futures of the trees that line their streets are no different.”
The government has previously pledged to plant a million trees in towns and cities as well as 11 million trees nationwide over the course of this parliament.
Article originally appeared on The Independent
The Institute cannot confirm the accuracy of this story or confirm that it presents a balanced view. If you feel this is inaccurate we would welcome your perspective and evidence that this is the case.
