tCI | PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PRACTICE

LAW · STANDARDS · ASSURANCE · QUALIFICATIONS

01 About tCI
Independent · Authoritative · Trusted

We are setting the standard for consultation and engagement.

Fair. Lawful. Defensible.

The independent authority on consultation and engagement across the UK: the people public bodies turn to for assurance, training and advice.

For over twenty years, organisations across the UK have looked to the Institute to make engagement fair, lawful and properly listened to: reducing legal, political and reputational risk, and earning public trust.

Recognition

Recognised from the High Courts to local authorities, the NHS and the wider public sector.

The assurance methodology cited in those judgments was developed by The Consultation Institute. tCI has adopted it in full and continues to maintain it.

Delegates listening intently in a training session
1,500+
Delegates trained
20+ yrs
Setting the standard
2
High Court references to the methodology
Fig. 01, Practice in dialogue
02 Setting the standard

The standard
others follow.

For more than twenty years, the Institute has defined what good consultation looks like, and tCI has been its custodian since 2025. Public bodies, regulators and the courts recognise our standards, and we keep advancing them as engagement meets new pressures, from digital participation and AI to tighter budgets and rising public expectations.

“A national body that sets and promotes standards of excellence.”Leicestershire County Council
Continuity of the Institute

Nothing was reinvented.

Twenty years of standards do not transfer on paper alone. Three things carried over intact, and they are the reason the work still holds.

i.

The intellectual property

The Code of Practice, the assessment frameworks, the case law catalogue and the editorial standard behind the Library came across whole. None of it was rewritten to suit a change of ownership.

ii.

The methodology

The assurance methodology referenced in the High Court is the Institute’s own. tCI adopted it in full, applies the same five phases to the same tests, and continues to maintain it.

iii.

The people

The Faculty of Fellows who wrote the standards still steward them. The same practitioners assure the same work, which is why a judgement made in 2019 and one made now rest on the same reasoning.

What the standard looks like in practice Maintained, not asserted
01 A catalogue of the case law Every reported judgment that shapes how public bodies must consult, read, summarised and tagged so practitioners can find the one that answers their question. See the case law → 245 Judgments, 210 on the duty to consult 02 A Library held to a written standard Guidance, regulator material, standards and methods, each entry assessed against a sixteen-field editorial standard before it is published. Browse the Library → 10 Assessed categories 03 An assurance framework with a defined end point Five phases from planning to decision, each evidenced, ending in the Certificate of Consultation Readiness rather than a verbal reassurance. See how QA works → 5 Phases to certification 04 A learning pathway, foundation to qualification Courses that build in sequence rather than stand alone, from a first public consultation through to advanced practice and accredited qualifications. See the pathway → 40+ Courses and qualifications 05 A profession that meets in the open Fortnightly Coffee Mornings on the judgment or method of the moment, written up in the Insight Journal so the thinking stays on the record. See the next session → 26 Sessions a year
04 What we stand for

Our values

Independence and integrity are the foundation of everything we do, and everything we're building next.

i.

Vision

A world where decisions that affect people are shaped by genuine, well-run engagement.

ii.

Standards

Rigorous, evidence-led benchmarks that make consultation fair, transparent and defensible.

iii.

Principles

Independence first. We hold no agenda but the integrity of the process itself.

iv.

Mission

To raise the quality of consultation everywhere, through assurance, training and advice.

05 Our Faculty

Our Faculty.

Our Faculty of Fellows brings together senior specialists from across the public, health and infrastructure sectors, practitioners who have shaped the field and who continue to set its standards.

Meet the Faculty →
Fellows

Our Fellows are the senior practitioners who set and safeguard the tCI standard. They steward the methodology and lead the most complex, high-stakes work we do: the people organisations turn to when a consultation has to withstand scrutiny.

→Steward the standards, frameworks and Code of Practice
→Lead independent assurance on high-stakes consultations
→Advise on contentious and legally sensitive engagement
→Design and deliver advanced training and qualifications
→Mentor practitioners and uphold quality across the field
→Represent tCI as an authoritative voice in the sector
Public sector · Health · Infrastructure · Transport
Colleagues in discussion around a boardroom table
Fig. 02, Working alongside our clients
07 How we work

Independent.
Alongside you.

We work as a critical friend, close enough to understand your context, independent enough to tell you what you need to hear. The result is consultation that earns trust and withstands challenge.

Start a conversation →
08 Trusted by

We work across the NHS, local and central government, emergency services, transport and infrastructure, and regulators.

NHS
Manchester Airport
Transport for London
EirGrid
Welsh Government
West Yorkshire Combined Authority
AECOM
In their words
The Consultation Institute has provided us with such sound advice. Their recommendations have been tremendously helpful.
Sally Baxter
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

Let's talk about your consultation

Need assurance, training or advice? The team is ready to help you get it right.

Talk to us →
Scroll to Top