Managing expectations around participation rates

There is seldom a formula for predicting participation rates but research suggests that the majority of digital engagement exercises follow the 90-9-1 rule.  That is, in a collaborative website such as a wiki, 90% of the participants of a community only view content, 9% of the participants edit content, and 1% of the participants actively create new content.  These percentiles are not dissimilar to public consultation where, even on salient issues, participation rates of 1% of the affected population is normal.

In a more dialogic setting, the split of those who visit can be further segmented –spectators (c.33%), joiners (c.20%), collectors (c.15%), critics (c.19%) and creators (c.13%)[1].  However, these proportions vary as a function of age.  For example, those aged 40 and over are less likely to be online critics and more likely to be web inactive.

It is worth noting that, in terms of the above breakdown, social media sites have different member profiles.  For example, YouTube users are much more likely to be spectators than creators compared to Facebook.  The type of engagement is also relevant.  For example, on Twitter participants are two times more likely to share a tweet than to promote it and only one in five interactions is likely to pledge action.

While engagement ratios are disappointing, high participation rates can still be achieved as a result of increased volume.  There is also scope for improvement.  Based on the number of UK adults who prefer expert involvement and information only, our estimate is that participation rates of 20% of all visitors exposed to an online dialogue could actually be achieved.

Good design can improve participation rates.  For example, of the various factors to consider in terms of improving response rates to survey alone, industry research[2] suggests that survey invitations sent at the beginning of a work-day receive more and faster responses.  The same report suggests that half of survey responses arriving within one day, and nearly all (96.5%) arrive within two weeks and that personalised invitations to respond can help increase responsiveness.

Similarly, an empty online forum will often stay empty until there is a critical mass of activity – the number and nature of existing activity is a contributing factor in terms of take-up.  There are two strategies for overcoming this – either nudge the willing into an early a provocative conversation or wait until there is enough pre-registered participants to open the space.

[1] http://www.forrester.com/NACTAS+Q1+2006+Devices+Access+Online+Survey/-/E-SUS471

[2] http://www.supersurvey.com/papers/supersurvey_white_paper_response_rates.pdf

This article originally appeared on tCI Wiki

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top

Your membership questions answered

View our frequently asked questions or contact our dedicated account manager for further support.

You can reset your password here. If you’re still having issues, please send us a message below.

We have many ways you can pay for your membership.

  • Credit card
  • Online
  • Invoice
  • PO

You can renew/upgrade your membership here.

To find out more, send us a message below.

You will receive a reminder email from our dedicated membership account manager 4 weeks before your renewal date. This email will contain all the information you need to renew.

You can also renew your membership online here.

You can update your contact details here. Alternatively, please send a message to our membership account manager below.

Please send a message to our membership account manager below. 

Still need support?

Our dedicated Membership Account Manager is on
hand to assist with any questions you might have.

Request a callback

Leave a message and our team will call you back

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

Send us a message

We’ll be in touch with you soon.

Name(Required)
Email(Required)