News & Insights
Mind our language! – Well-meaning attempts to curb unnecessary jargon are in danger of dumbing down intelligent debate
The Local Government Association (LGA) has published a list of 200 terms “that public bodies should not use if they want to communicate with local people.”
High time, you might say! Without doubt we all rely too much on jargon, and just as certainly a lot of it obscures rather than illuminates. Of the 200 terms highlighted by the LGA, we could easily jettison about half of them without shedding a tear. But let’s pause for a little thought before jumping on this particular bandwagon, and let’s examine in more depth why we have such a proliferation of terminology and why it is tempting to use them on occasions.
Access to this content is exclusively for Institute members
Not a member? Unlock this article and more today by signing up for a Consultation Institute membership. Benefit from access to over 300 Topic Papers and Briefing Notes, discounted rates on all public training and more. Click on Join Now today to find out more and sign up.
Rhion Jones
More news
This is the first in our series on the Gunning Principles, if you would like to talk further email us...
From initiatives encouraging active travel to digital service adoption, today’s public policies increasingly require citizens to alter established habits. Behaviour...
With the UK aiming to have half of short urban journeys walked, wheeled, or cycled by 2030, local authorities must...
