Section 114 Notices and Consultation: What the Law Requires

A Section 114 notice is a statutory declaration that a council cannot balance its budget under the Local Government Finance Act 1988. It triggers an immediate prohibition on new expenditure beyond statutory services, requires the full council to meet within 21 days to consider the officer’s report, and typically brings government commissioners into the picture.

What it does not do is suspend the council’s consultation obligations.

The Gunning principles, established in R v Brent LBC ex parte Gunning (1985) and reinforced by the Supreme Court in Moseley v Haringey [2014], still apply to any proposal to cut or restructure services. Consultation must take place while proposals are still formative. Respondents must receive enough information to give an intelligent response. Adequate time must be allowed. And the decision-maker must genuinely consider what they hear before reaching a conclusion. None of those tests carry a financial crisis exemption.

The Public Sector Equality Duty continues in parallel. Before finalising cuts, councils must assess how proposals affect people with protected characteristics and record that analysis. Failure to do so can invalidate a decision entirely. A Bristol judgment from 2018 struck down a decision on special educational provision specifically because the authority had consulted only after the cuts had been agreed internally.

The message from case law does not change across these cases: urgency can shorten timelines, but it cannot replace genuine process.

What makes consultation particularly difficult when a whole budget is under pressure?

The financial crises affecting councils such as Woking, Croydon, and Birmingham did not put one service at risk. They put all services on the table simultaneously. That creates a consultation problem as much as a governance problem.

When every department is proposing savings, councils face pressure to run multiple consultations at once. The result can be a barrage of surveys and public meetings that confuses residents, overwhelms communications teams, and produces feedback that is difficult to act on coherently.

The Gunning principles do not require a 12-week process in every case. Courts have accepted shorter timelines where a clear rationale exists. But they do require that the process as a whole is reasonable, that respondents have access to honest information about the scale of the problem, and that responses are genuinely weighed in the final decision. Running ten parallel surveys, none of which connects to a clear decision-making structure, is unlikely to meet that test.

How have recent Section 114 councils handled this in practice?

The cases of Woking, Croydon, and Birmingham show markedly different approaches.

Woking (Section 114, June 2023) faced a deficit of approximately £1.2 billion, driven by failed property investments. Its approach to consultation was sequential. Staff and trade unions were consulted first on redundancy proposals, allowing those discussions to settle before the wider public was asked about service cuts. That sequencing helped focus the public consultation and avoided a situation where residents were asked to weigh in on proposals that were still being revised internally.

Croydon (Section 114, November 2022) launched its “Budget 2023/24: We want to hear from you” exercise in December 2022, immediately after its third notice in two years. The consultation was frank. Materials set out clearly that a £60 million gap had to be closed and that £35 million of that required new savings. Residents were asked to rank service priorities rather than simply respond to a pre-formed cuts list. The council then published a summary showing how responses had shaped the final March 2023 budget, which protected children’s services and social care to a greater degree than the original draft. That “you said, we did” record matters legally as well as politically: it shows the feedback loop was real.

Birmingham’s story runs in a different direction. Its Section 114 in September 2023 was driven by an £87 million in-year overspend and a £760 million equal pay liability that had built up over years. The equal pay crisis is, in part, a consultation failure: had there been earlier, honest internal engagement with staff on pay equity, the liability that eventually overwhelmed the council’s finances might have been contained. The commissioners who took over oversight found that weak prior transparency had allowed the problem to compound. They then imposed a rigorously documented process, including detailed public scenario consultations on budget options, council tax levels, and asset sales, that gave the subsequent decisions a degree of defensibility that earlier decisions had lacked.

What should decision-makers take from these cases?

Several practical points follow from the pattern above.

Sequence matters. Consulting staff and trade unions before the public allows proposals to be refined before they reach a wider audience. It also reduces the risk that a public consultation is pre-empted by internal decisions that have already been taken.

Honest framing is not optional. Residents and scrutiny committees can only respond intelligently to a consultation if they understand the scale of the problem. Framing cuts vaguely, or presenting a predetermined outcome as a choice, invites both legal challenge and political damage. As the Supreme Court made clear in Moseley, presenting a single option as though it were the only possible one is itself capable of vitiating the exercise.

Documentation is a defence. Courts examining rushed consultation focus less on whether the timeline was ideal and more on whether the process was reasonable given the circumstances, and whether responses were genuinely considered. Councils should record why time was short, what steps were taken to maximise participation, and how feedback changed the final proposals.

The equality assessment cannot be retrospective. Equalities analysis needs to sit alongside budget modelling from the start. If a cuts package disproportionately affects a protected group and that was not assessed in advance, the decision is vulnerable regardless of how well the consultation itself was conducted.

---

How tCI Can Help

Organisation Wide Learning Hub Access
Equip your entire team with professional consultation skills through one platform. Self paced courses, live virtual classrooms, practical toolkits and expert resources that build a shared baseline of competence across your organisation. Trusted by councils, NHS bodies and regulators nationwide.

Bespoke Training Workshops
Training that works with your real projects, not hypothetical scenarios. Sector tailored sessions help teams apply good practice to live challenges: sharpening consultation documents, building defensible codebooks, strengthening equality analyses. Half day or full day workshops for health, local government, planning and public service teams.

Coaching for Complex or High Risk Consultations
Expert guidance when the stakes are highest. One to one and small group coaching for senior officers navigating legally exposed or politically contentious decisions. Strengthen your judgement on proportionality, evidence standards and challenge management. Essential for organisations that may face judicial review risk or major service changes.

Whether you’re preparing for a high stakes service change, building long term consultation capability, or need confidence that your evidence approach will stand up to scrutiny, we can help.

Contact tCI: hello@consultationinstitute.org