Skip to content

Health Sect rejects scrutiny committee’s grounds for referral

A once in a lifetime transformation of hospital care in south Essex will go ahead after attempts to stop the plans were rejected.

The plans involve sharing services between Basildon, Broomfield and Southend Hospitals and closing Orsett Hospital. Southend and Thurrock Councils claimed the consultation was flawed as were proposals to remove stroke services from Southend Hospital and to close Orsett Hospital. Concerns were also raised about the lack of detailed planning as part of the £118m plan. Health Secretary Matt Hancock rejected the claims after taking advice from the independent reconfiguration panel, which stated the concerns raised by both councils were “not a sufficient reason not to proceed.” Southend Council objected to the entire plan including moving stroke services from Southend to Basildon Hospital. Thurrock Council claimed the plans to close Orsett Hospital in Grays and replace it with four new integrated medical centres were “not in the interest of health services in Thurrock”.

The panel accepted the consultation, like all consultations, could be improved but concluded the public consultation were satisfactory. The panel also accepted details about the relocation of stroke services from Southend were “a little light” but pointed out expert bodies were in favour and had a full review been carried out.

“Basildon Hospital would have been the more likely site for a single hyper-acute stroke unit serving the whole population.” The report by the independent panel, on the issue of stroke unit placement, added: “The panel does not presume to have any greater expertise than those bodies already closely involved.”

The impact of the change once it takes place will be reviewed by medical experts to assess what it means for patients and could be reassessed. The panel also noted the closure of Orsett Hospital had been set out in 2015, agreements had been signed and the plans were still valid. The report stated: “The panel consider that both decisions are in the interests of health services locally.” Critics also objected to the lack of practical details about how patients would be transferred between hospitals and what it would mean for staff. The panel concluded: “If issues around safe transfers and workforce are still the cause of concern locally then the opportunity exists to deal with these concerns and provide necessary assurance as the NHS works with its stakeholders towards the implementation phase.”

Tom Abell, deputy chief executive of Basildon, Southend and Broomfield Hospitals, said: “We are pleased we now have the green light from the independent panel of experts and the Department of Health to improve care for residents. We look forward to delivering the commitments we have made.”


This article originally appeared on Basildon Canvey Southend Echo

The Institute cannot confirm the accuracy of this story or confirm that it presents a balanced view. If you feel this is inaccurate, we would welcome your perspective and evidence that this is the case.

Sign up to receive our newsletter

By signing up to our mailing list, you agree to our terms and conditions. You can unsubscribe or change your subscription preferences at anytime by clicking here.
Scroll To Top