The plans include extending the tram network, developing four more park-and-ride interchanges, a strategic network of cycle and walking routes along with seamless pricing, ticketing and accessibility which would allow passengers to move between buses and trams.
This 66 per cent figure prompted Councillor Lesley Macinnes, transport convener, to announce that the results were “extremely encouraging” and may be seen by some as an emphatic endorsement of the council’s vision. But before rushing to see this figure as a vindication of the way forward, a pause may be required.
Out of the total population of Edinburgh of around 500,000, only 1,355 responses were recorded from members of the public with a further 19 from key agencies and a further 138 from other stakeholders, which can hardly be construed as a robust, representative sample.
This, of course, is not the fault of Councillor Macinnes who can only work with the numbers she is presented with. However, there must surely be questions asked regarding the low participation rate, given the important nature of the issue.
Is this just another manifestation of public apathy or could it be a sign of public mistrust of such consultation exercises? Or is it that the silent majority are in favour of the plans but did not bother to record their views?
Local politicians will look for a reason that best suits their agenda but perhaps what is needed is a consultation exercise on why people do not participate in consultation exercises!
Article originally appeared on Edinburgh Evening News
The Institute cannot confirm the accuracy of this story or confirm that it presents a balanced view. If you feel this is inaccurate we would welcome your perspective and evidence that this is the case
